<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A comparison of tackling HDTV and climate change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mummybot.com/philosophy/a-comparison-of-tackling-hdtv-and-climate-change/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mummybot.com/philosophy/a-comparison-of-tackling-hdtv-and-climate-change</link>
	<description>A place to explore the question - what does it mean to be human?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marieke</title>
		<link>http://www.mummybot.com/philosophy/a-comparison-of-tackling-hdtv-and-climate-change/comment-page-1#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Marieke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mummybot.com/philosophy/a-comparison-of-tackling-hdtv-and-climate-change#comment-231</guid>
		<description>While I think &#039;the real mummybot&#039; is unnecessarily rude, and his/her assertion that HDTV causes climate change is unsubstantiated and, therefore, also weak, a good point is being made.

HDTV will help fuel climate change - my memory is poor but I think that it will take the annual output of a small hydro station just to power the box top sets we will all require, and that doesn&#039;t include the power sucked up by the tv sets themselves.  With the decision made unilaterally by gov&#039;t, there was no public debate of this hidden consequence of what&#039;s being touted as a necessary development for NZ&#039;s technological future.  The lack of discussion is especially ironic within the context of Clark&#039;s &#039;aspirations&#039; for climate neutrality.

But the real (and useful) point raised by &#039;the real mummybot&#039; is that your too loose intro to this blog has unhelpfully distracted attention from the guts of your argument about the appropriateness/need for gov&#039;t intervention on particular issues.  It&#039;s a discussion that&#039;s well worth having, and I can see the parallel you&#039;re trying to draw between HDTV and cc, but   your challengeable assertions right upfront  divert the debate you&#039;re trying to have. 

In my humble opinion... : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think &#8216;the real mummybot&#8217; is unnecessarily rude, and his/her assertion that HDTV causes climate change is unsubstantiated and, therefore, also weak, a good point is being made.</p>
<p>HDTV will help fuel climate change &#8211; my memory is poor but I think that it will take the annual output of a small hydro station just to power the box top sets we will all require, and that doesn&#8217;t include the power sucked up by the tv sets themselves.  With the decision made unilaterally by gov&#8217;t, there was no public debate of this hidden consequence of what&#8217;s being touted as a necessary development for NZ&#8217;s technological future.  The lack of discussion is especially ironic within the context of Clark&#8217;s &#8216;aspirations&#8217; for climate neutrality.</p>
<p>But the real (and useful) point raised by &#8216;the real mummybot&#8217; is that your too loose intro to this blog has unhelpfully distracted attention from the guts of your argument about the appropriateness/need for gov&#8217;t intervention on particular issues.  It&#8217;s a discussion that&#8217;s well worth having, and I can see the parallel you&#8217;re trying to draw between HDTV and cc, but   your challengeable assertions right upfront  divert the debate you&#8217;re trying to have. </p>
<p>In my humble opinion&#8230; : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mummybot</title>
		<link>http://www.mummybot.com/philosophy/a-comparison-of-tackling-hdtv-and-climate-change/comment-page-1#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>mummybot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mummybot.com/philosophy/a-comparison-of-tackling-hdtv-and-climate-change#comment-179</guid>
		<description>HDTV does cause climate change, but I still think the comparison is valid. This isn&#039;t an article about what the causes are, rather highlighting the need (and possibility) for strong government intervention when tackling climate change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HDTV does cause climate change, but I still think the comparison is valid. This isn&#8217;t an article about what the causes are, rather highlighting the need (and possibility) for strong government intervention when tackling climate change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the real mummybot</title>
		<link>http://www.mummybot.com/philosophy/a-comparison-of-tackling-hdtv-and-climate-change/comment-page-1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>the real mummybot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mummybot.com/philosophy/a-comparison-of-tackling-hdtv-and-climate-change#comment-177</guid>
		<description>This is pretty weak. Even for you. HDTV causes climate change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty weak. Even for you. HDTV causes climate change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

